Epworth Rectory Haunting: The Famous Haunting You’ve Never Heard Of

The Epworth Rectory haunting, also known as the Wesley poltergeist, is among the best-documented and most intriguing paranormal cases in English history.

Occurring between December 1716 and January 1717, with some activity possibly extending to March, in the small village of Epworth, Lincolnshire, England, this haunting disrupted the lives of the Wesley family, led by Reverend Samuel Wesley and his wife Susanna.

The phenomena, which included loud noises, knockings, footsteps, and physical disturbances, were attributed to a ghost nicknamed “Old Jeffrey” by one of the Wesley daughters, Hetty.

The case is important not only for its detailed documentation through family letters but also for its connection to the Wesley family, whose sons John and Charles later founded Methodism.

---

---

Overview

Attribute	Details
Name	Epworth Old Rectory, Wesley Poltergeist
Location	1 Rectory Street, Epworth, Doncaster, Lincolnshire, DN9 1HX, England
Longland Scale	L-4 [See the Longland Scale Explanation]
History	The original rectory burned down in a devastating fire in 1709, from which John Wesley was dramatically rescued. The haunting, involving loud noises and moving objects, occurred in the rebuilt rectory between December 1716 and January 1717.
Death Toll	0 confirmed historical deaths + 0 deaths attributed to the entity (The fire in 1709 was not fatal to the family)
Type of Haunting	Poltergeist, Apparitions
Lunar / Seasonal Pattern	The most intense activity was reported around Christmas (Christmas Day 1716 to January 1717)
Entities	Allegedly, the spirit of “Old Jeffrey,” a caretaker who had died a couple of weeks before the haunting began, or possibly the ghost of a headless badger seen by Mrs. Wesley.
Manifestations	Inexplicable banging, knocking sounds (often three or four knocks at a time, loud enough to wake the rector), groans, sounds of footsteps, rattling chains, horns being blown, wood being sawed, objects being thrown, and an instance of a levitating bed.
First reported sighting	December 1, 1716 (The initial groans and knocking heard by a maid)
Recent activity	It has been reported that some people have since heard bangs and groans coming from upstairs, though never to the same extent as the original 1716-1717 events.
Threat Level	3/10 (mildly threatening) [See the Threat Level Explanation]
Hoax Confidence Rating	3/10 (Probably authentic) [See the Hoax Confidence Rating Explanation]
Open to the public?	Yes. It is maintained as the Epworth Old Rectory Museum. It is generally open from April to October on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays, 10am to 4pm, with guided tours available.

Historical Background

The Setting: Epworth and the Rectory

Epworth, a small village near the River Trent in Lincolnshire, England, was the backdrop for the haunting. The Old Rectory, a Queen Anne-style brick building, was rebuilt in 1709 after a fire destroyed the previous structure on February 9, 1709.

The fire was rumored to have been arson by villagers who opposed Reverend Samuel Wesley’s strict High Church Anglicanism, though no definitive evidence supports this claim. The rebuilt rectory was a substantial structure, designed to house the rector of St Andrew’s Church and his family, reflecting permanence amid local tensions.

The village was marked by social and religious discord. Samuel Wesley’s rigid religious principles clashed with the Puritan-leaning sentiments of some parishioners, leading to disputes over tithes and other issues. This atmosphere of conflict, combined with the family’s isolation in the rectory, may have contributed to the psychological and emotional context of the haunting.

The Wesley Family

The Wesley family was central to the haunting and significant in English religious history. Reverend Samuel Wesley (1662–1735) served as the rector of St Andrew’s Church from 1695 until his death in 1735.

His wife, Susanna (1669–1742), was a devout and influential character, often called “The Mother of Methodism” for her role in shaping her children’s religious upbringing. The couple had 19 children, though only nine survived to adulthood.

The children present during the haunting included:

• Emilia (Emily, 23): The eldest daughter, who later believed she was followed by “Old Jeffrey” throughout her life.
• Susanna (Suky, 20/21): Known for her religious devotion.
• Mary (Molly, 19/20): Another older daughter.
• Mehetabel (Hetty, 18/19): Credited with nicknaming the ghost “Old Jeffrey.”
• Anne (Nancy, 14): A younger daughter.
• Martha (Patty, 9/10): A young child.
• Kezia (6): The youngest daughter.

John Wesley (1703–1791), who later founded Methodism, was studying at the University of Oxford during the haunting, as was his brother Samuel Jr. (25). Charles Wesley (1707–1788), another future Methodist leader, was too young to play a significant role.

---

---

The Haunting

The Epworth Rectory haunting began on December 1, 1716, and continued for approximately eight weeks, with some reports suggesting minor activity persisted until March 1717.

The events unfolded as follows:

• December 1, 1716: Servants Robert Brown and a housemaid first heard eerie groans and mysterious knockings in the dining room, initially dismissed as trivial.
• Early December 1716: The younger girls, including Hetty, Nancy, Patty, and Kezia, began hearing noises, prompting concern among the family.
• Christmas Day 1716: The ghost, nicknamed “Old Jeffrey” by Hetty, made its presence known to the entire family. Susanna Wesley described hearing “such a noise in the room over our heads, as if several people were walking, then running up and down stairs,” causing fear that the children would be frightened.
• Late December 1716: The disturbances intensified, with loud knockings, banging, and sounds resembling the crash of glass, a hand mill moving, clanking chains, and heavy boots treading. Objects were thrown, furniture moved, and beds levitated, particularly in the nursery. The younger girls reported being pinched and scratched by an unseen force.
• Early January 1717: Samuel Wesley confronted the ghost in the children’s nursery, shouting, “Thou deaf and dumb devil, why dost thou frighten these children!? Come to me, come to my study… I am a man!” The spirit responded with knocking but fell silent, marking a turning point. On another occasion, Samuel was awakened by nine loud knocks, with pauses every third stroke, followed by his door being flung open and shut with force.
• Late January 1717: The disturbances began to subside, becoming less frequent and intense.
• March 1717: The haunting ceased abruptly, with no further significant incidents reported.

The phenomena were most pronounced in specific areas of the rectory, including the nursery, attic, paper chamber (occupied by Suky and Molly), matted chamber (Emily and Nancy), and master bedroom (Samuel and Susanna).

The family also reported hearing an invisible horn blown at deafening volumes and a frequent creaking sound, likened to a saw or windmill, every night around a quarter before ten at the house’s northeast corner.

Who Was Old Jeffrey?

The identity of “Old Jeffrey” remains one of the most enigmatic aspects of the Epworth Rectory haunting. Hetty Wesley, the fourth-eldest daughter, proposed the nickname, possibly referring to a man who had died in the previous rectory before its destruction in 1709.

Some accounts suggest that “Old Jeffrey” may have been the ghost of a former caretaker or servant who died shortly before the haunting, though no historical records confirm this individual’s existence or connection to the rectory.

Paranormal theories propose that “Old Jeffrey” was a poltergeist, a type of ghost known for physical disturbances, often linked to the emotional or psychological energy of a living person, typically a teenager. In this case, Hetty or other younger children may have been the focus, given their prominence in reporting physical interactions.

Modern psychic interpretations have speculated that the disturbances could reflect family tensions, such as Susanna Wesley’s reportedly unhappy marriage or Hetty’s dislike for the rectory, though these claims lack contemporary evidence.

Emily Wesley, later Mrs. Harper, believed she was followed by “that wonderful thing called by us Jeffrey” throughout her life, as noted in a letter to John Wesley 34 years later. This suggests the haunting had a profound and lasting impact on her, reinforcing the personal significance of the entity.

Despite these theories, the true identity of “Old Jeffrey” remains unknown. The lack of definitive evidence fuels ongoing speculation, making the ghost a central mystery of the Epworth Rectory haunting.

Family Experiences and Reactions

The Wesley family’s reactions to the haunting evolved over time. Initially, the children were terrified, with some speculating that the disturbances were caused by local witchcraft, a common belief in early 18th-century England.

The younger girls, particularly Hetty, Nancy, and Kezia, reported the most intense physical interactions, such as pinching and scratching, which heightened their fear.

Reverend Samuel Wesley was initially skeptical, suspecting the noises might be pranks by young men or even his daughters concealing lovers. However, his perspective shifted after experiencing the phenomena firsthand, including the nine loud knocks and the violent movement of his door.

His confrontations with the ghost, including his bold challenge in the nursery, reflected his determination to protect his family, though they did not immediately halt the disturbances.

Susanna Wesley, while deeply religious, approached the events with a mix of concern and pragmatism, documenting them in letters to her son Samuel Jr. She noted the intensity of the Christmas Day incident and the fear it caused among the children.

Over time, the family grew accustomed to the noises, with the youngest sister, Kezia, even pursuing them for diversion, treating “Old Jeffrey” as a curious presence. The sisters would remark, “Jeffrey is coming; it is time to go to sleep,” thereby normalizing the supernatural within the household.

Servants, including Robert Brown, corroborated the family’s accounts, adding credibility to the reports. The haunting’s abrupt end in January 1717, possibly extending to March, coincided with news that Samuel Jr. and John Wesley were safe, which may have alleviated family stress and contributed to the cessation of activity.

Investigations and Documentation

The Epworth Rectory haunting, occurring between December 1716 and January 1717, is one of the most meticulously documented paranormal cases in English history, owing to the Wesley family’s detailed records and following publications.  

---

---

Contemporary Investigations

In the early 18th century, the concept of formal paranormal investigations did not exist, and the Wesley family’s efforts to understand the disturbances were informal but thorough for the time.

Reverend Samuel Wesley, the rector of St Andrew’s Church in Epworth, took a proactive approach to investigate the phenomenon. Initially skeptical, he suspected the noises—first reported by servants on December 1, 1716—might be caused by natural factors or pranks.

Samuel conducted multiple searches of the rectory, examining the attic, nursery, and other areas where the disturbances were most frequent, but found no evidence of intruders, animals, or structural issues that could explain the loud knockings, footsteps, or object movements.

As the phenomena escalated, Samuel’s investigations took a more confrontational turn. On several occasions, he addressed the entity directly, particularly in the children’s nursery, where the disturbances were most intense. In one important incident in early January 1717, he shouted, “Thou deaf and dumb devil, why dost thou frighten these children!? Come to me, come to my study… I am a man!”

The spirit responded with knocking but did not cease, indicating that Samuel’s attempts to expel it were ineffective. He also attempted an exorcism, commanding the entity to leave, but this had no immediate effect.

Local clergy and neighbors were aware of the disturbances, and some visited the rectory to witness the phenomena, though no formal inquiry was conducted, reflecting the era’s limited framework for investigating supernatural events.

Susanna Wesley, although not leading investigations, contributed to the family’s efforts by observing and documenting events. She noted specific patterns, such as the periodic creaking sound at the northeast corner of the house every night around a quarter before ten, which she likened to a saw or windmill.

Her observations, combined with Samuel’s searches, suggest a systematic attempt to understand the phenomena, even if no conclusive explanation was found at the time.

Family Documentation

The foundation of the documentation of the Epworth Rectory haunting lies in the letters written by the Wesley family during the period of the disturbances.

These letters, primarily addressed to Samuel Wesley Jr., who was studying in London, and John Wesley, who was at Oxford University, provide firsthand accounts of the events from multiple perspectives.

Susanna Wesley and her daughters—Emilia, Susanna (Suky), Mary (Molly), Mehetabel (Hetty), Anne (Nancy), Martha (Patty), and Kezia—wrote detailed descriptions of the phenomena, ensuring a comprehensive record.

Susanna’s letters to Samuel Jr. are particularly significant, as they capture the progression of the haunting. In a letter dated January 1717, she described the Christmas Day 1716 incident, noting, “there was such a noise in the room over our heads, as if several people were walking, then running up and down stairs that we thought the children would be frightened.”

She also documented the escalation of the disturbances, including the sounds of crashing glass, clanking chains, and heavy boots, as well as physical interactions like the pinching of the younger girls. These letters reveal the family’s initial skepticism, growing fear, and eventual acceptance of the phenomenon as supernatural.

The daughters’ letters to John Wesley further enrich the documentation. Hetty, who nicknamed the ghost “Old Jeffrey,” wrote about specific incidents, such as the levitation of beds in the nursery and the sensation of being pinched by an invisible force.

Emilia, in a letter written years later to John, reflected on the haunting’s lasting impact, stating she believed “that wonderful thing called by us Jeffrey” followed her throughout her life. These accounts are consistent across family members, lending credibility to the reports.

Servants, including Robert Brown, also contributed to the documentation by corroborating the family’s experiences, with Brown reporting the initial groans heard in the dining room on December 1, 1716.

Samuel Wesley maintained a diary during the haunting, though it survives only in excerpts quoted by John Wesley and later historians. In his diary, Samuel recorded specific events, such as the nine loud knocks he heard in early January 1717, with pauses every third stroke, followed by his door being flung open and shut with force.

The letters and diary excerpts were preserved by the family and later housed in archives, including those of the Methodist Church and academic institutions like the John Rylands Library at the University of Manchester.

Their survival has enabled researchers to access primary sources, making the Epworth Rectory haunting one of the best-documented paranormal cases of its time.

Later Publications and Analyses

Following publications and historical analyses further expanded the documentation of the Epworth Rectory haunting. One of the most significant is Adam Clarke’s Memoirs of the Wesley Family, first published in 1823.

Clarke, a prominent Methodist theologian, devoted forty-six pages to the haunting, quoting extensively from the family’s letters and Samuel’s diary excerpts.

His work provides a broader context for the events, exploring the Wesley family’s religious beliefs and the social tensions in Epworth that may have influenced their interpretation of the phenomena. Clarke’s detailed treatment reinforces the case’s credibility, as it draws on primary sources and corroborates John Wesley’s account.

Other important figures, such as Dr. Joseph Priestley and Robert Southey, also wrote about the haunting. Priestley, a scientist and theologian, provided particulars of the case in his writings, while Southey, in his Life of Wesley (1820), reproduced the accounts, noting, “The testimony on which it rests is far too strong to be set aside because of the strangeness of the relation.”

---

---

Theories and Explanations

The Epworth Rectory haunting has been interpreted through both paranormal and rational lenses, with no definitive explanation resolving the debate.

Paranormal Perspectives

Poltergeist Activity: Many researchers classify the haunting as a classic poltergeist case, characterized by physical disturbances centered around a living “agent.” The younger children, particularly Hetty, may have been the focus, possibly due to emotional or psychological stress, a common trait in poltergeist phenomena.

Spirit of a Deceased Person: Some theories propose that “Old Jeffrey” was the ghost of a deceased individual, such as a former caretaker or resident of the previous rectory. The suggestion that the name derived from a man who died in the earlier structure supports this idea, though no evidence confirms it.

Portent or Omen: In the religious context of the time, some family members interpreted the haunting as a warning or divine sign, possibly related to Samuel Wesley’s health or the family’s future challenges.

Rational Explanations

Natural Causes: Skeptics suggest that the noises could have resulted from structural issues in the newly built rectory, such as creaking floorboards, settling foundations, or wind. Animal activity, such as rats or birds in the attic, could also explain some sounds.

Psychological Factors: The concept of mass hysteria or collective suggestion has been proposed, where the family’s fear, religious intensity, and social isolation amplified minor disturbances into a perceived supernatural event. The stress of living in a hostile community may have contributed to this dynamic.

Prank-Playing: Some speculate that the children, particularly the older daughters, may have staged events to frighten their siblings or attract attention. However, the consistency of reports across multiple witnesses, including adults and servants, makes this less likely.

Modern Analysis

Modern paranormal researchers view the Epworth case as a foundational example due to its detailed documentation and historical significance. The consistency of the family’s accounts, corroborated by servants, lends credibility to the paranormal interpretation, though the lack of physical evidence limits definitive conclusions.

Skeptics argue that the historical context and lack of modern investigative tools make it difficult to verify the phenomena, favoring natural or psychological explanations. The debate continues, with the case serving as a touchstone for discussions about poltergeist activity and the supernatural.

Comparison with Other Hauntings

The Epworth Rectory haunting shares similarities with other poltergeist cases, such as the Enfield Poltergeist and the Bell Witch, but its early date and detailed documentation set it apart.

Below is a comprehensive comparison table of similar hauntings, highlighting key aspects and contextualizing the Epworth case:

Name	Location	Type of Haunting	Activity Level
The Enfield Poltergeist	Enfield, North London, England	Poltergeist, Intelligent, Apparitions	9/10 (extremely active and dangerous)
Bell Witch	Adams, Tennessee, USA	Poltergeist, Demonic (alleged), Intelligent	8/10 (very active)
Borley Rectory	Borley, Essex, England	Poltergeist, Apparitions, Ghosts (General)	7/10 (very active)
Amityville Horror House	Amityville, New York, USA	Demonic, Poltergeist, Apparitions	9/10 (extremely active and dangerous)
30 East Drive (Pontefract Poltergeist)	Pontefract, West Yorkshire, England	Poltergeist, Demonic (alleged), Manifestations	10/10 (extremely active and dangerous)
The Thornton Heath Poltergeist	Thornton Heath, London, England	Poltergeist, Apparitions, Residual	5/10 (occasional)
The Drummer of Tedworth	Tedworth, Wiltshire, England	Poltergeist, Manifestations	6/10 (occasional)
Stanley Hotel	Estes Park, Colorado, USA	Ghosts (General), Intelligent, Apparitions	7/10 (very active)
RMS Queen Mary	Long Beach, California, USA	Residual, Intelligent, Apparitions	8/10 (very active)
Eastern State Penitentiary	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA	Residual, Intelligent, Apparitions	9/10 (extremely active and dangerous)
Zvíkov Castle	Zvíkov, Czech Republic	Elemental, Manifestations, Curse	4/10 (occasional)
Willingdon Mill	Willingdon, East Sussex, England	Poltergeist, Manifestations	6/10 (occasional)

Conclusion

The Epworth Rectory haunting remains a compelling and complex case, blending historical, religious, and paranormal elements. Its detailed documentation through family letters, combined with its connection to the Wesley family, ensures its place as a foundational case in paranormal research.

While theories about “Old Jeffrey” and the causes of the disturbances—ranging from poltergeist activity to natural or psychological explanations—continue to fire up debate, the haunting’s impact on the Wesley family and its cultural legacy is undeniable.

The Epworth Rectory haunting continues to captivate, inviting exploration of the unknown and the connection between faith, fear, and the unexplained.